Source: US National Republican Congressional Committee
The following text contains opinion that is not, or not necessarily, that of MIL-OSI –
A new report details Joyce Elliott’s pattern of refusing to pay her taxes (in two different states!) over the course of a decade, even as she voted to raise taxes on Arkansas families.
In case you missed it…
Congressional hopeful Elliott pays disputed N.Y. taxes
Arkansas Democrat Gazette
October 17, 2020
State Sen. Joyce Elliott, the Democratic candidate for Congress in Arkansas’ 2nd Congressional District, paid delinquent New York taxes last month, after resisting payment for more than a decade.
In an interview, the Little Rock lawmaker said she decided to settle the matter after disputing the taxes for years.
Elliott is facing Republican U.S. Rep. French Hill of Little Rock.
A tax warrant of $9,234.32, dating to September 2011, and another for $349.87, dating to March 2018, were satisfied on Sept. 9, according to the New York State Department of State’s online Tax Warrant Notice System.
The New York taxes, Elliott said, were levied because of her employment, from 2003 to 2010, at the College Board. The Manhattan-based nonprofit group owns the SAT, a leading college admissions examination, and runs the Advanced Placement program, which allows high school students to earn college credit.
“I paid taxes in New York some of those years,” she said.
Elliott held a number of positions there, according to her annual Arkansas statements of financial interest, including director of advance placement field initiatives, education outreach consultant, education field services director and director of state and legislative research.
New York eventually levied taxes on earnings that had already been taxed by Arkansas, she said.
“We had this dispute about that particular tax,” she said. “We fought about it and fought about it, and were not coming to any kind of [resolution]. This has been about four or five months ago. I realized, OK, I’m not winning this.”
Ultimately, she decided to pay.
“It was a substantial amount of money, so I had to pay it when I could pay it,” she said.
Elliott’s campaign said she ultimately agreed to pay $5,510.47.
The final amount owed was even lower, she said.
Earlier this month, the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance sent Elliott an “overpayment notice” telling her that she would be receiving a partial refund, her campaign said.
The letter, shown to an Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reporter, said “a net refund has been authorized” due to an overpayment of $2,535.76. The campaign declined to allow the document to be copied.
A check for the overpayment, which included an additional $7.93 for interest, was included with the letter and has been deposited, the campaign said.
Elliott’s New York tax dispute overlapped with tax disputes in Arkansas.
In March 2011, the Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration filed two liens against Elliott for delinquent individual income taxes.
One, for $8,833.12, was released in July 2011, after she submitted full payment. The other, for $338.55, was released in June 2012 after being paid.
Elliott has also repeatedly been assessed penalties for late payment of property taxes, court records show.
The National Republican Congressional Committee, which uncovered the New York tax documents, said they raise questions about Elliott’s fitness to serve.
“Joyce Elliott is a typical liberal politician who thinks the rules don’t apply to her. Elliott has consistently supported higher taxes on Arkansas families, but can’t be bothered to pay her own tax bill,” committee spokesman Bob Salera said in a written statement.
Hill said the liens raise questions.
“She’s quick to raise taxes on people,” he said. “If these assertions or allegations are true, I hope she’ll tell us why she’s not a better steward of her own tax obligations.”
Elliott said it was hard dealing with dual tax demands from New York and Arkansas, but that she paid what she was owed.
Asked about the Republican criticism, Elliott said, “I’m sure that they are raising attention to try to degrade me in some fashion.”
“I don’t think there is a shortage of people in our district or in this state or in this country” who have had a disagreement with taxing agencies, she added.