MILLION the IOS Version. Region: Uk –
Source: the President of Latvia, in Latvian
2. in may, the State minister Egils Levits sent to the Saeima for secondary consideration for 2020. on p. 23. in April, the introduction of the law “on Amendments to the Public entertainment and special events in the act”. The parliament in the law on detalizējusi of Public entertainment and special events in the law already existing, the communist and the nazi totalitarian regime, the symbol of the prohibition of the use in public events.By-law amendments to the parliament explicitly denied the public the measures used in the former SOVIET union, former USSR republic and nazi Germany’s armed forces, law and order, and the order of the organ (criminal authorities) in the value of belonging to your clothing (uniforms), the clothing features a combination of articles of apparel, clothing accessories, distinctive signs, kokardes, uzpleči, equipment, materials) according to their visual appearance clearly allows for the identification of the armed forces or the repressive bodies.The state minister Egils Levits. thanks the Parliament for that’s the law of precision, which makes it all the better and more accurate assessment of a Public entertainment and festival safety law of the two totalitarian regimes in the symbol of the prohibition of the use. “In a democratic society, cannot be accepted, and the acceptable of the two totalitarian regimes of the symbol and the attribute of the public use for the purpose of slavināt the mode of thinking, or to express a nostalgic sentiment direction of the modes, in an attempt to communicate the attractiveness of and promote it to the general public, or again, to make the normality of the public discourse,” the Parliament, by a letter written by the State president.E. Levitt in his letter, points out that the Republic of Latvia introduction to the lays of the state, and the company’s obligation to condemn the communist and nazi totalitarian regimes and their crimes. One of this is the obligation of the implementation of the forms are also in the mode of a symbol of the totalitarian and criminal nature of particularly izceļošu for the attribute to exclude from the public sphere”.At the same time, the president of the State of the law in the secondary screening at the time called for the Parliament to deal with certain technical norms of the law on the wording of the gaps, which are likely to raise questions about the norms of the law on the scope.E. Levitt has pointed out that the legislature itself must decide to act on all possible exceptions to the symbol of the use of the ban. Already, the law allows such symbols to use at public events, where their use is not associated with the totalitarian regimes in slavināšanu, or the offence of commission of the criminal offences, the acquittal. However, in addition to these exceptions, the parliament is now in the new law amendments are to include an additional reference to the local government the right to decide on the authorisation for the use of prohibited symbols. The country’s president, believes it will not be possible.The parliament, by letter of the State minister Egils Levits, draws attention to the fact that the reference to the law of the text is unmistakable, and the cause of the risks of the state in a common policy and a common approach to the totalitarian regimes of the symbol of the prohibition of the development of democracy. Of the act, the wording could also result in a variety of the act of translation and, consequently, a variety of practices iedibināšanos from municipality to municipality.The president of the state Egils Levits has called on the Parliament to exclude the reference to the local government’s options to rule on the permit for the exemption from the symbol of the ban. “Good law-making the principle requires that the same legislature, at the outset, rule out any doubt about the norms of the law on the scope of, and not the least able of the act for the purpose of circumventing or exposure to soften,” in a letter written by E. Levitt.Similarly, E., Levitt pointed to the need for Public entertainment and special events in the law to clearly lay down not only to the public, an organizer of the event, but also to the public, event participants and visitors of the obligation to comply with the statutory restrictions, including a ban on the use of the two totalitarian regimes of the symbols.In a public event at the statutory prohibitions are obligations to comply with public event organisers, so the event for visitors and participants. The law should provide that the administrative responsibility for the law on the requirement of infringement may be applied to public event organizers, it’s also a public event attended, and the participants.The country’s president, Egila Levite letter to the Saeima, chair of the Inārai Mūrniecei to be seen in the president’s office tīmekļvietnes in the section “the scope of the” – “Activities in the legislative field,” – “to Re-screening of the requests”.
EDITOR’S NOTE: This article is a translation. Apologies should of the grammar and/or sentence structure of not for be the perfect.